0.024cm^3 glyphosate herbicide + distilled water to complete 50cm^3
0.048cm^3 glyphosate herbicide + distilled water to complete 50cm^3
1:1 sex ratio
13.8° C water temperature
16 year study
25-40°N and 80-70°W
50cm^3 of distilled water
Actual fertility values multiplied by 0.001 since around 0.1% of all eggs are assumed to survive
After bleach event.
All April matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal.  Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus_2: different model structure
All August matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal. Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus: different model structure
All December matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal.  Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus_2: different model structure
All February matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal.  Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus_2: different model structure
All January matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal.  Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus_2: different model structure
All July matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal. Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus: different model structure
All June matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal.  Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus: different model structure
All March matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal.  Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus_2: different model structure
All May matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal.  Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus_2: different model structure
All November matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal. Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus: different model structure
All October matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal. Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus: different model structure
All September matrices from 1972-1983 pooled, survival data seasonal. Shares source as Sigmodon_hispidus: different model structure
Altitude range: 1000-2600 m
Altitude range: 1000-2600 m; NAs represent not calculated transitions
Altitude range: 650 - 1800 m
Altitude: mean of the range given by the author
Altitudes of 5 Populations: A: 800-900, B: 800-920, C: 710-740, D: 860-1060, E: 519-686
Analysis of Males, Females Separately, Monthly Checks, Fecundity done through expectation
Annual mortality (all death causes combined); no fertility observed
AnnualPeriodicity is unclear
Assuming mortality registered is 100% of true mortality
Assuming mortality registered is 50% of true mortality
Assumption of a stable population; simulated data
Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used High values for this matrix
Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used Low values for this matrix
Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used Medium values for this matrix
Avarage cohort data
Average
Average case scenario; 0.001 is assumed for survival in the last age class
Baseline
Baseline scenario (good): population with no access to urban food sources and no conflict-bear removals
Baseline scenario (poor): population with no access to urban food sources and no conflict-bear removals
Before bleach event.
Best case scenario; 0.001 is assumed for survival in the last age class
Both
C - Matrix stand for immigration that was modelled by the author; F - Matrix includes only Reproduction of females (calculated by sex ratio M/F : 1.05351037330765
C - Matrix stand for immigration that was modelled by the author; F - Matrix is zero because of males are unable to reproduce themselves but author provides average sexratio (M/F): 1.05351037330765
C - Matrix stand for immigration that was modelled by the author; F - Matrix is zero because of males are unable to reproduce themselves but author provides average sexratio: male = 1.05351037330765 females
Calculated with demographic data from: Harris and Smith 1987
Calculated with demographic data from: Storm 1976, Allen 1984
Calculated with demographic data from: unpublished data from Saunders and McIlroy
Chicks fledged from early broods
Chicks fledged from early broods; There are NA values for first year birds and adult survival because this information was not collected
Chicks fledged from early broods; There is a NA value for adult survival because this information was not collected
Chicks fledged from early broods; There is a NA value for first year birds survival because this information was not collected
Chicks fledged from late broods
Chicks fledged from late broods; There are NA values for first year birds and adult survival because this information was not collected
Chicks fledged from late broods; There is a NA value for adult survival because this information was not collected
Chicks fledged from late broods; There is a NA value for first year birds survival because this information was not collected
Classes = based on the phase in which individuals were born
Competition vs. A. formosa
Competition vs. Encrusted branches
Coordinates of the laboratory were used; Projection interval 1 hour
Data are read out from graphs so minor deviances are possible; Here fertility = fledging success
Data from one year of sampling, one week of fishing
Data on adult males limited, not included in analyses; 'Pooled' because information collected by 7 different organizations and compiled by authors for analysis
Decreasing population
Density-independent model
Domestic dog population
ENSO (El Nino/Southern Oscillation) model a regional catastrophe whereas normal years do not account for any catastrophes
ENSO years (El Niño-Southern Oscillation)
Estimates partially supplemented by literature
Examination on 3 different heights
Excludes data from 1998 which is when the ice strom occured. We used 0.3 as our estimate of fledgling 4); survival of small passerines from fledging until their first breeding seasons ranges from 0.1 to 0.3 Although we have no data on SY fecundity for Cerulean Warblers, younger individuals of other warbler species tend to have lower reproductive output; on the basis of literature values, SY fecundity was modeled as 80% that of ASY males
Fecundity assumed to be independent of size (i.e.constant)
Fecundity assumed to be related to volume.  Chosen as reference on the basis that there is evidence that sponge fecundity is related to individual volume.
Fecundity assumed to have a linear relationship eith size (measured as circumference)
Fecundity comes for lab based enclosures
Fecundity comes for lab based enclosures; There are NA values for diapause and post diapause survival because this information was not collected
Fecundity data provided by Iowa dept of natural resources.  Size data collected by authors; no units available for stages description.  This is a native population.
Fecundity not availble
fecundity rate obtained from different data
Fecundity values = number of eggs
Fecundity values = pregnancy rates; modeled with data from Raithel J Wild Manag 2006
Fecundity values extracted from diagram
Fecundity was not measured
Female, age of immigrants = 3 years
Female, age of immigrants = 6 years
Female, no immigration
Females raw data without correction factory
Fertility values multiplied by 0.62 (share of females in adult population: 62%) to account for that the matrix was constructed for all sexes combined
Fertility: only births of females
Fertility: only births of females; There are NA values for juvenile survival because this information was not collected
Fertility: only daughters; Survival: all sexes together
Fertility: only female births; Survival: all sexes together
Fitted model
flow and water temperature as environmental input
FRANK
FRANK, data from literature
FRANK, source: Eberhardt 1994
FRANK, source: Hovey and McLellan 1996
FRANK; Data from different sources
FRANK; data from different sources; assumed sex ratio: 1:1; model calculated from 10 populations observed at San Francisco River and Gila River
FRANK; Data from literature, standardized elements to allow comparisons
FRANK; Data from literature, standardized elements to allow comparisons,  two species used to compile one matrix (O. clarki lewisi & S. malma)
FRANK; data from literature; fecundity-values = annual egg production; assumed sex ratio: 1:1
FRANK; High fertility values
FRANK; Low fertility values
FRANK; Matrix parameters are estimated from the literature.  If estimates unavailable, related species were used.    Repro values take into account offspring survival
FRANK; Matrix parameters are estimated from the literature.  If estimates unavailable, related species were used.  All estimates come from a paper by Todd et al. (2005), so data taken from this paper.  Todd et al. consider effects of temperature so, cod come from hatchery, but model incorporates temperature data, which in turn, comes from Mitta Mitta River - 7 km downstream of dam - GPS coordinates taken from this dam site.  Repro values take into account offspring survival
FRANK; Matrix parameters are estimated from the literature.  If estimates unavailable, related species were used.  Fecundity estimates take into accuont survival.
FRANK; Matrix parameters are estimated from the literature.  If estimates unavailable, related species were used.  Repro estimates take into account survival of larvae and eggs.
FRANK; Mean matrix calculated instead of using the given one
FRANK; Preliminary post breeding projection matrx, this was used to run simulatios
FRANK; Reproduction values have been requested; One value of the function is missing (Phi) and varies between 0 and 1, Mean Reprod Info calculated under assume Phi=1
FRANK; Rhode Island Geolocation: 41° 24' to 42° 43' N, and from 71° 47' to 71° 32' W; Virginia Geolocation: 36°  17' N, 89°  41' W) and West Virginia Geolocation: 37°  51' N, 80°  19' W; Used the mean transition value over the three locations
FRANK; Simulation
FRANK; Stage-specific vital rates were estimated
FRANK; The matrix elements were estimated or sourced from the literature.  The location information provided refers to the population that matrices were designed to describe.  Because estimates sourced from literature I have not digitized any location information: Ural river passses through Russia and Kazakstan - Kazakstan appears most appropriate country of reference given that some co-authors based here.
FRANK: Simulation
FRANK: Survival rates for female elk obtained from Rearden (2005); Pregnancy rates multiplied by offspring sex ratio (0.5); pregnancy rates for elk 1-2 years and >14 years obtained from ODFW unpublished data, pregancy rates for elk 3-13 years obtained from Johnson et al. (2013)
FRANK: Survival rates for male elk obtained from McCorquodale et al. (2011) and adjusted to count for harvest; Pregnancy rates multiplied by offspring sex ratio (0.5); note male elk data comes from Blue Mountains of WA, author assumed them to be similar
Geolocation = range; longitude= estimated at the coast of Chile
Geolocation approximated
Geolocation are the Birch river and Whitemouth river systems; Corrected error in paper: Life cycle does not match with matrix model, assumed that life cycle is correct because of text and explaination
Geolocation is Missouri, data from different sources combined, harvest by humans
Geolocation range: 1° 15' - 3° 30' S 33° 52 - 35° 42' E
Geolocation range: 124° 04' - 156° 23' W
Geolocation range: 129-151° E 31-40° S
Geolocation was approximated using Google Earth
Geolocations / Altitudes of populations: 19° 10' S 146° 51' E;  18° 35' S 146° 29' E / 0 m; 0 m
Geolocations / Altitudes of populations: 19° 10' S 146° 51' E;  18° 35' S 146° 29' E / 0 m; 0 m; There is a NA value for survival of the stage "Prior to visible recruitment" because this information was not collected
Geolocations / Altitudes of populations: 19° 10' S 146° 51' E;  18° 35' S 146° 29' E / 0 m; 0 m. Element a1,1 unknown
Geolocations range: 29° 45' S to 31° 30' S 23° 30' to 25° E
good environmental conditions; fecundity data - "Primiparity at 2 years and most females reproduced every year"
good environmental conditions; fecundity data - "Primiparity at 2 years and most females reproduced every year"
Growth from Stage 2 to 3 and stasis of Stage 3 is inexplicable higher than 1 as given in the Appendix of the Author
Growth transition probalbilities estimated from the best-fit model (Richardson function)
High density; simulation
High density; Simulation
High elevation site
High nutrition/ low predation
High nutrition/high predation
High predation n=7
High value for 2 yrs survival
High value for 2 yrs survival, survival rate for row 4 probably a typo
High values for survival and fecundity; Simulation
High values, Assumed sex ratio: 1:1; Coordinates: source: 44° 36' 14'' N 4° 3' 11' E and river mouth: 44° 26' 10'' N 4° 19' 57'' E
Includes data from 1998 which is when the ice strom occured. We used 0.3 as our estimate of fledgling 4); survival of small passerines from fledging until their first breeding seasons ranges from 0.1 to 0.3 Although we have no data on SY fecundity for Cerulean Warblers, younger individuals of other warbler species tend to have lower reproductive output; on the basis of literature values, SY fecundity was modeled as 80% that of ASY males
Increasing population
Insecticide DDT was used in Germany since the 1940s and banned in 1973, potentially explaining this very low reproduction rate of the period 1947–1974
it appears best and worst case fecundity were switched, but follewed note in Table 1
Juvenile mortality NA in source paper, probably because no juveniles were born
Juvenile survival estimates not available, paper used the estimates for WR3 instead or elastcity analysis etc - so I have inserted the values for WR3 population here.
Juvenile survival was estimated assuming constant population size and no growth
Kaki are part of a captive breeding-and-release program
Lab based population
Lab based population; There are NA values for diapause and post diapause survival because this information was not collected
Large Patch (≥ 10 ha)
Lecithotrophic development
Life history estimates for Silver Shiner were based on sampling data from Canadian populations collected between May 31 and July 13 2011; fecundity estimates were extrapolated on the literature for the closely related Emerald Shiner
Low and high removal: populations that use urban environments to forage during poor natural food years benefiting from urban food, but experiencing reduced survival from conflict-bear removals
Low density; simulation
Low density; Simulation
Low elevation site
Low nutrition /low predation
Low predation n=7
Low predation, density high n =3
Low predation, density low n =3
Low value for 2 yrs survival
Low value for 2 yrs survival, mean calculated by author, survival rate for row 4 probably a typo
Low values for survival and fecundity; Simulation
Low values, Assumed sex ratio: 1:1; Coordinates: source: 44° 36' 14'' N 4° 3' 11' E and river mouth: 44° 26' 10'' N 4° 19' 57'' E
M11: Northern subpopulation, M12: South-to-north export, M21: North-to-south export, M22: Southern subpopulation
Made on basis of years of mark recapture data, fecundity takes into account juvenile survival probabilities and sex ratio and propensity of females to spawn.  Class - based on tail length (TL) and fork length (FL)
Male, age of immigrants = 3 years
Male, age of immigrants = 6 years
Male, no immigration
Males raw data with correction factor: 6.8 times classes 0-3 years
Males raw data with correction factors: 6.8 times classes 0-3 years; 50 % mortality assumed in the first year of life
Males raw data without correction factor
Many parameter estimates were taken from unpublished data collected by the Institute for Wetlands and Waterfowl Research as part of the Prairie Habitat Joint Venture Assessment Program. In most cases, we used data collected from 11 sites that were 54 to 78 km2 in area and widely distributed across prairie and parkland habitat in Canada. We studied 2 sites in 1993 and 3 each year during 1994-1996.
Matrix = constructed by information of different studies
Matrix 3x2 made to 2x2
Matrix element a2,1 could not be calculated due to very low numbers of recaptures - rate from 2006 was used in paper instead, so I have added that here.
Matrix interval is one day
Matrix interval is one month
Matrix intervall is 13 days; pedicted matrix output of Individual Based model
Matrix is mean estimate for the study period pooled from all 27 sites; estimated all vital rates (except non-breeding season female survival) from data collected on our radio-marked mallards; We generated estimates of non-breeding season female survival from annual female survival rates estimated by Doherty et al. (2002) for 1987–1999 in southern Saskatchewan and Alberta
matrix of baseline + offtake vital rates for female cows, final culling at age 13
matrix of baseline + offtake vital rates for male cows, final culling at age 9
matrix of baseline vital rates for female cows
matrix of baseline vital rates for male cows
matrix of combined baseline + offtake survival rates, assuming females make up 69% of the population at steady state; final culling at age 9 for males and 13 for females
matrix of combined baseline survival rates, assuming females make up 69% of the population at steady state
Mature at age 0
Max. matrix; no fecundity measured
Maximum matrix
Maximum Matrix
Maximum values for survival and fecundity
Maximum vital rates; Pregnancy rates not multiplied by sex ratio
Mean average matrix
Mean calculated by author
Mean calculated by author regardless of the different treatments; FRANK, sources: see observations of the different matrices
Mean matrix calculated by author
Mean matrix calculated here instead of using the given one in original citation
Mean matrix of seasonals; Standard Length (SL) not clarified
Mean matrix of seasonals; Standard Length (SL) not clarified.  Recruitment is modelled as a vector NOT in the matrix
Mean matrix of seasonals; Standard Length (SL) not clarified. Recruitment is modelled as a vector NOT in the matrix
Mean matrix; no fecundity measured
Mean of 5 year interval matrices
Mean of low and high elevation sites
Mean of pooled data
Mean of pooled data.  Shares source with Marmota_flaviventris_2
Mean of seasonal matrices (2001-2003)
Mean of two cohorts; Geolocation approximated
Mean of two populations and two cohorts; Geolocation approximated
Mean value for 2 yrs survival, mean calculated by author, survival rate for row 4 probably a typo
Mean values, Assumed sex ratio: 1:1; Coordinates: source: 44° 36' 14'' N 4° 3' 11' E and river mouth: 44° 26' 10'' N 4° 19' 57'' E
Mean values; Simulation
Mean vital rates; Pregnancy rates not multiplied by sex ratio
Median matrix
Median Matrix
Midpoint values  for survival and fecundity
Min. matrix; no fecundity measured
Minimum matrix
Minimum Matrix
Minimum values  for survival and fecundity
Minimum vital rates; Pregnancy rates not multiplied by sex ratio
Monthly
Monthly matrices; Data extracted and pooled from 4 papers with different populations; Observation years not able to digitize
most-arid site (1) to the least-arid site (8)
No
No competition
No continuous observations from 1952 to 2012 but data was pooled from different observations
No fecundity available
No Fecundity rates presented; radio-collaring took place after 9 months, thus infant mortality was not recorded
No full lifespan observed; no data about staying in last age class
No predator, paper contains estimates of mortality rates for each stage. GPS approximation; Sampling was conducted 1 per week for a month, not over the course of the entire year
Normal values for egg survival; data on annual reproduction effort were determined from literature
Normal years
Only considered those Chinook Salmon that were naturally produced from the Muskegon River, data for baseline matrix estimated from long term studies, observation etc.
Only female births, Sex ratio at birth = 43% female births, based on interbirth interval of 9.3 years, age at first reproduction of 15.4 and age at last reproduction of 50
Only female reproduction was given in the paper, assumed same values for reproduction of males because of same proportion shown in Fig. 2 in the paper
Only fertility measured for this year
Only hunting mortality; no fertility observed
Only natural mortality (defined by the author as: "moose found dead without any sign of injury from hunters or vehicles"); no fertility observed
Only vehicular mortality; no fertility observed
Parameter values for the von Bertalanffy growth function (VGBF)
Per-capita sexual reproduction not provided in original source, but adjusted so as to obtained the population growth rate reported in source, Simulation
Per-capita sexual reproduction not provided in original source, but adjusted so as to obtained the population growth rate reported in source; Simulation
Period of time = not available, because elements of the matrices are calculated by parameters of different studies
Planktotrophic development
Pooled 13days step matrix over a 8month-period, larvaes captured from Patuxent River, MD
poor environmental conditions; fecundity data - "Primiparity at 2 years and most females reproduced every year"
Pre-hatching rates used for calculation of fertility
Predator, paper contains estimates of mortality rates for each stage. GPS approximation; Sampling was conducted 1 per week for a month, not over the course of the entire year
Radiocollared samples
Range for Latitude: 18° 45' - 18° 50' N (Isla Socorron), 18° 20' - 18° 22' N (Isla Clarion); Range for Longitude: 111° 00' - 110° 56' W (Isla Socoron), 114° 45' - 114° 42' W (Isla Clarion)
Reduced mortality
related to age at maturity, all matrices calculated by computer simulation
Related to age at maturity, all matrices calculated by computer simulation; AnnualPeriodicity is unclear
Reproduction values: Number of fledged young (not clutch size)
S2 (average scenario); Simulation
Sceanario 1
Sceanario 2
Scenario = winter and spring temperatures  more likely to increase than summer ones; high temperature for pupa and overwintering larva stages, and medium temperature for other stages
Scenario 1: Reduced female harvest; Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used High values for this matrix
Scenario 1: Reduced female harvest; Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used Low values for this matrix
Scenario 1: Reduced female harvest; Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used Medium values for this matrix
Scenario 2: Coyote removal; Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used High values for this matrix
Scenario 2: Coyote removal; Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used Low values for this matrix
Scenario 2: Coyote removal; Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used Medium values for this matrix
Scenario 3: Comination of scenario 1 and 2; Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used High values for this matrix
Scenario 3: Comination of scenario 1 and 2; Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used Low values for this matrix
Scenario 3: Comination of scenario 1 and 2; Author provided low, medium and high levels of values, used Medium values for this matrix
SEM/AVS = simultaneously extracted metals/acid volatile sulfides; study duration: 70 days
Sex ratio at birth assumed from Fig.2: 37 Females per 39 males, cub survival=0.802; Female 1-3 yr mortality: Survival, estimated by censoring unexplained lost signals including harvested animals was 0.923 and survival including harvested and translocated animals was 0.880. Survival estimated by treating lost signals as mortalities was 0.939, 0.877 , and 0.847 , respectively.
Sex ratio at birth assumed to be 14 males per 26 females, mortality for goats >3 yrs old not modelled
Sex ratio at birth calculated from mean survival and sex-specifc survival, assuming that juvenile survival is equal
Sex ratio: 1:1
Sex ratio: 1:1; Altitude range: 200-500 m
Sex ratio: 1:1; Altitude range: 300-400 m
Shares source as Spermophilius_armatus: different model structure
Shares source with Marmota_flaviventris_2
Simulation
Simulation; Fertility information has been requested to author
Simulation; Sex ratio is missing, so Transition 3 to 1 and 4 to 1 is not available
Simulation; Used maximum values given in paper
Simulation; Used mean values given in paper
Sj is estimated based on what lambda was set equal to
Small Patch (<10 ha)
source: Mace and Waller 1998
source: Pease and Mattson 1999, edited version of Ursus_arctos_subsp._horribilis_2
source: Wielgus 1994
source: Wielgus, Bunnell, Wakkinen 1994
Species taken from river, experiment in laboratory for 27 days, date not provided in study
Stable population
Static method using mean values from total catch
Study duration: 14 days
Summer (corrected value for the first stage)
Survival from Omaha Zoo; Fertility from Mysore Zoo; Surv: 1968; Fec: 1994
Survival values for 13-31 yrs calculated after a formula, values are in Eumetopias_jubatus, 1975-1985; Stasis information of last stage missing
SurvTransition probabilities are given per week
Temperate climate
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Amsterdam). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Buenos Aires). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Canberra). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Hagåtña). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Jakarta). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Jerusalem). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Monrovia). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Port of Spain). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Pretoria). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Santiago de Chile). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Singapore). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Sofia). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Tokio). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the capital of the popuation country (Washington D.C.). Only reproduction relevant stages are included in the matrix.
The GPS coordinates were approximated to the closest geographic location described in the reference. 
The size distribution of Canadian Pugnose Minnow was based on sampling data collected in Ontario in September of 2003 and July to October of 2010. Growth was assumed to follow that of Pugnose Minnow in Ohio. Fecundity estimates from Pugnose Minnow in Louisiana were used.
The transition matrix (A) for a 2-year reproductive cycle in the unfished condition.
The transition matrix (A) for a 2-year reproductive cycle under current conditions.
The transition matrix (A) for a 3-year reproductive cycles in the unfished condition.
The values for the matrix are compiled from multiple sources
This is a matrix constructed from a long term dataset in the UK: size was estimated in a single season but female fecundity from a long term dataset.
This model is the result of having fixed the fraction of blood meals taken on competent hosts (hc) to 0.1; The data was gathered through a laboratory experiment
This model is the result of having fixed the fraction of blood meals taken on competent hosts (hc) to 0.2; The data was gathered through a laboratory experiment
This model is the result of having fixed the fraction of blood meals taken on competent hosts (hc) to 0.3; The data was gathered through a laboratory experiment
This model is the result of having fixed the fraction of blood meals taken on competent hosts (hc) to 0.4; The data was gathered through a laboratory experiment
This model is the result of having fixed the fraction of blood meals taken on competent hosts (hc) to 0.5; The data was gathered through a laboratory experiment
This model is the result of having fixed the fraction of blood meals taken on competent hosts (hc) to 0.6; The data was gathered through a laboratory experiment
This model is the result of having fixed the fraction of blood meals taken on competent hosts (hc) to 0.7; The data was gathered through a laboratory experiment
This model is the result of having fixed the fraction of blood meals taken on competent hosts (hc) to 0.8; The data was gathered through a laboratory experiment
This model is the result of having fixed the fraction of blood meals taken on competent hosts (hc) to 0.9; The data was gathered through a laboratory experiment
three primary areas in Florida (southern portion of Everglades National Park, Key Largo, Florida Power and Light Company´s Turkey Point power plant)
Transition 1 to 2 is not available because author did not observed enough nests
Transition 1 to 2 is not available because not enough nests were observed
Transition Egg to 1st instar is NA because the author did not marked those stages for this population and year
Transition probabilities are given per week
Tropical climate
two localities (Canal Luis Pena reef, CLP and Palomino reef, PAL)
Upper values for egg survival; data on annual reproduction effort were determined from literature
Used Electro Fishing
Used high values of vital rates provided in paper
Used low values of vital rates provided in paper
Used mean values of vital rates provided in paper
Vital rates pooled from multiple sources
We Ignored immigration rates (to stage 5) of 0,208 that was given in the paper (Cell 5,5 would be 1,06 then)
We ignored immigration rates of 0.207 for each age class above 1 year
Western North Atlantic Population is determined as the average of the subpopulations
Winter
With immigration
Without immigration
Worst case scenario; 0.001 is assumed for survival in the last age class
yearling survival rate not calculated; fecundity rate obtained from different data